|
|
|
July
6, 2006
Vol. 2, Issue 6
Who
Should Control Your Healthcare?
As
health savings accounts grow in popularity, there
is growing fear among those who want to nationalize
healthcare that they will not be able to put the cat
back in the bag. There are already over 3 million
HSA owners, and by 2010, the Treasury Department estimates
as many as 45 million Americans will be covered by
HSA plans. They will have billions of dollars
invested to cover future medical expenses, and by
then it will be politically impossible to take that
benefit away.
|
The
Free Market vs. The "Single-payer" System
I
currently insure my family with a high-deductible health
plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield. I have a health
savings account with several thousand dollars invested
in a mutual fund that has been doing quite well.
Over the next twenty-two years I plan to continue to
fund the account, and fully expect to have over $500,000
in the account when I retire. I'll be able to
use this money to pay for my healthcare in whatever
way I please, tax free. I can go to the best surgeons,
or the least expensive doc-in-a-box. If I decide
to treat my condition with acupuncture, homeopathy,
or psychic healers, I can do that too. Whoever
offers me the best deal will get my business, and since
I'm the one paying, it will be my choice. I have
healthcare freedom.
 |
My
son Wiley IV, who is currently 3 years old, might not
be so lucky. If proponents of a single-payer system
were to ever have their way, he'll be at the mercy of
a government bureaucrat when it comes to his healthcare.
To see what this may look like, all one has to do is
look at the state of health care in Canada, England,
New Zealand, and the parts of Europe that have not yet
abandoned single-payer systems.
The
Canadian/British Model
Proponents
of a single-payer system tend to point to Canada or
England as countries that cover all their citizens with
quality healthcare, while spending less money per person
than the U.S. But if we look a little more closely,
we see that these publicly financed health insurance
systems are breaking down, the quality is low, and the
costs can be quite high. Here's what Canadians
have to deal with if they need medical care:
- Long
waits. Hundreds of Canadians go to Detroit
and other U.S. cities every year for procedures
like CAT scans, for which they can obtain treatment
in a matter of days. In Canada, the wait is
typically six months. Currently 876,000 Canadians
are on waiting lists for medical procedures.
- Difficulty
in getting life-enhancing procedures done.
If a Canadian is having a heart attack, they will
be treated right then. But if the surgery
is considered "elective" (meaning that
possible death is not eminent), the wait could be
months or years. Average wait for cataract
removal is 18 months. Average wait for a knee
replacement is one year.
- Increased
risk of dying. The average Canadian waits
eight weeks to see a specialist, and another nine
weeks before getting treated. This is even
the case with conditions that are likely to get
much worse if there is any delay in treatment.
For example, the median time for a mastectomy is
14 weeks, enough time for the cancer to spread to
other parts of the body. In fact, 28% of those
diagnosed with breast cancer in Canada die from
it, while the mortality ratio in the U.S. is 25%.
Things
don't look any better across the ocean. Each year
the British National Health Service cancels 410,000
surgeries because of resource shortages. According
to the London Sunday Times, there are currently over
1 million Brits awaiting elective surgery. Thomas
Cook, a British travel agency, is even considering offering
"sun-and-surgery" packaged trips to Indian
hospitals for British citizens fed up with low standards
and long waiting times for surgery.
The
British and Canadian governments have the power to make
healthcare "free", but they are unable to
control its costs. So the costs become longer
(and potentially fatal) delays, and fewer innovations.
Econ
101
Its
not surprising when you think about what is happening.
Universal health insurance systems always encourage
over-consumption by patients, and such over-consumption
always leads to financial crises. The result is
inevitably broken promises about universal access and
quality care. Because there are always limited
resources, single-payer systems tend to overspend on
primary care for the healthy, while denying more expensive
specialist care to those with serious medical problems.
This is because most people (voters) are healthy most
of the time, and the sick and dying are less likely
to be able to organize into a political force.
With
Independence Day just passing, this is a good time to
reflect on what makes our country great. If I
had to boil it down to one word, it is "freedom".
Though our freedoms seem to be constantly under attack,
there is still no nation in the world that has the freedom
of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of association,
or the free markets that we have in the United States.
As anyone who understands even a smidgen of economics
knows, free markets encourage competition and innovation,
which lead to lower prices and better quality.
Though
the U.S. system of health care can not really be considered
a "free-market", it is certainly much more
free than any single payer system. Some of the
benefits we see as a result of our current healthcare
system include:
| |
- U.S.
medicine produces the best outcomes for virtually
every patient, from premature babies to elderly
cancer patients.
- American
companies are the chief source worldwide of new
treatments and procedures which each year are
used to save millions of lives.
- U.S.
medical training and research facilities are the
best in the world.
|
The
Power of a Free Market
Though
Canadians might have to wait a year or two for hip replacement
surgery, they can get the same operation done on their
dog in less than a week. This is because veterinarians
are competing for that business, finding innovative
ways to deliver service more quickly and less expensively.
Another example is laser eye surgery, a procedure that
is rarely covered by insurance, so laser eye surgeons
must compete on the basis of cost and quality.
While costs for most medical procedures have been going
up every year, the cost for this procedure has dropped
by 80% over the past decade.
Unfortunately,
U.S. policies still tend to limit competition, restrict
consumer's freedom to choose, and discourage consumers
from shopping for value. Thus, there are too few
choices and there has been little attention paid to
price and quality of service. The answer is clearly
not more government intervention, but instead letting
competition and the power of the marketplace drive down
prices and increase quality and access to care.
HSAs
are the Solution
There
is increasing recognition that third-party payers are
actually a major cause of escalating medical costs and
a decline in the quality of service. The increasing
adoption of HSA plans has already begun to cause greater
transparency and competition in the medical marketplace.
There are now physicians available by phone, medical
kiosks setting up in malls, doctors that accept only
cash (and who charge significantly less), and others
competing directly for the consumer's healthcare dollar.
Don't
be fooled by the politicians who advocate a single-payer
system, claiming their only concern is the uninsured.
If a single body (such as a government bureaucracy)
controls healthcare, they control one seventh of the
national economy. And everywhere in the world
that central control of the economy has been tried,
it has been a colossal failure.
As
public policy reforms centered on individual choice
continue to gain wider footholds, I believe the result
will be greater prosperity, greater choice, and a better
value for all. The culture of dependence and entitlement
will begin to fade, as millions of individuals demand
further policy reforms that will reinstate the values
of freedom and personal responsibility that helped establish
this great nation.
As
more consumers turn to health savings accounts, the
market will respond. Innovative providers will
begin to compete more on price and quality of service,
and those that provide the best value will get wealthy
doing so. And all consumers will benefit.
And the idea of a return of "Hillarycare"
may finally be behind us.
To
your health and wealth,
Wiley
Long
President - HSA
for America
P.S.
- If you do not yet have an HSA-qualified health insurance
plan, you can find complete information, instant quotes,
and applications on our website, www.HSAforAmerica.com.
If you have friends or associates who are still overpaying
for underutilized health insurance, please forward this
to them. The more people who have HSAs, the better
off we'll all be.
P.S.S.
- Next month I'll get back to the practical - how to
save money on your doctor visits. Many times you
may want to talk to a doctor, but don't really want
to set an appointment and spend $125 just to get some
questions answered. I'll cover some of the new
physician telephone consultation services that are now
available, and how they can save you a lot of money.
Subscribe
to Maximize Your HSA
|
|